Mercedes SL 1998 vs Mercedes CLK 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 7.3 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 525 HP | 136 - 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 750 NM | 190 - 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 9.8 seconds | 8.1 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 15.9 | 9.4 - 10.6 | |
|
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SL is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 237 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes SL has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SL has 28 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. The Mercedes CLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 2`013 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |