Mercedes SL 1998 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes SL is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Stratus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 7.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 525 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 750 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 9.8 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 - 15.9 | 9.3 - 11.5 | |
|
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mercedes SL is 40 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Mercedes SL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`207 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |