Mercedes SL 2001 vs Mercedes SL 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.7 - 6.0 | 2.8 - 7.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 500 HP | 204 - 525 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 800 NM | 270 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 7.2 seconds | 4.8 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 - 15.1 | 10.7 - 15.9 | |
|
Mercedes SL 2001 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SL 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SL 2001 is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes SL 1998, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL 2001 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
317 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SL 1998 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes SL 2001 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SL 1998. This could mean that the Mercedes SL 2001 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL 2001 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes SL 1998. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`188 | ~ 2`207 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes SL has
| |