Mercedes SL 2006 vs Honda S2000 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.5 - 6.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 - 612 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 999 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 6.6 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 - 15.1 | 9.9 | |
|
Mercedes SL petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda S2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Mercedes SL is larger. Mercedes SL is 40 cm longer than the Honda S2000, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 143 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
339 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SL has more luggage capacity. Mercedes SL has 92 litres more trunk space than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda S2000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`247 | ~ 1`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SL has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |