Mercedes R class 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes R class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes R class also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.5 | 2.4 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 388 HP | 163 - 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 540 NM | 320 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 9.6 seconds | 9.5 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 13.2 | 8.1 - 11.5 | |
|
Mercedes R class petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Mercedes R class equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mercedes R class is 19 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes R class is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Mercedes R class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes R class has 33 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes R class (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes R class is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`848 | ~ 2`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes R klase has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |