Mercedes ML 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 154 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mercedes ML engine produces 123 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 45 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Chrysler Crossfire | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.57 m | |
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 18 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 21 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`650 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |