Mercedes ML 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996

 
Mercedes ML
1998 - 2001
Mitsubishi L 200
1996 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 218 HP95 HP
Torque: 310 NM154 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 secondsn/a seconds
Mercedes ML engine produces 123 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 156 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.8no data
Fuel tank capacity: 72 litres75 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years44 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Chrysler CrossfireUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.50 m
Width: 1.83 m1.66 m
Height: 1.78 m1.57 m
Mercedes ML is larger.
Mercedes ML is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 18 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 21 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`6502`400
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 24004800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes ML has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Mitsubishi L 200 has
  • timing belt engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv