Mercedes ML 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but Mercedes ML torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller. Mercedes ML is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mercedes ML has 471 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |