Mercedes ML 1999 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 49 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 8 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 633 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2020 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity. Mercedes ML has 223 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 179 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`810 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`045 kg | 1`534 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 765 kg | 516 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem more than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes ML has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |