Mercedes ML 1999 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 49 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 8 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`365 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes ML has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |