Mercedes ML 1999 vs Nissan Terrano 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 17.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 38 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.7 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`365 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
| |