Mercedes ML 1999 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller. Mercedes ML is 12 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`365 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |