Mercedes ML 1999 vs Nissan Terrano 2000

 
Mercedes ML
1999 - 2001
Nissan Terrano
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.7 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 163 HP125 HP
Torque: 370 NM278 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds16.7 seconds
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes ML engine produces 38 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 92 NM more than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.9
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes ML consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
900 km on highway910 km on highway
Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.70 m
Width: 1.83 m1.76 m
Height: 1.78 m1.85 m
Mercedes ML is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data115 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1900 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`3652`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 2200no data
Pros and Cons: Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Nissan Terrano has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv