Mercedes ML 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 347 HP | 347 HP | |
Torque: | 510 NM | 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
Mercedes ML 2001 and Mercedes ML 1999 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes ML 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 14.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 18.6 l/100km | 15.9 l/100km | |
The Mercedes ML 1999 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML 2001 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML 1999, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML 2001 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML 2001 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML 1999. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
500 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
Mercedes ML 2001 and Mercedes ML 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`365 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |