Mercedes ML 2001 vs Mercedes E class 1999
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.4 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 347 HP | 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 530 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.8 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 18.6 l/100km | 13.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 18 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 39 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2020 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes E class may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 1500 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`870 kg | 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`225 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 500 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Mercedes E class. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |