Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 34 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 16.5 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2020 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`870 kg | 2`495 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`135 kg | 1`994 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 735 kg | 501 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |