Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 292 HP | 258 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 34 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 16.5 | |
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
740 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`495 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |