Mercedes ML 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 292 HP | 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML 1999 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML 2001 engine produces 55 HP less power than Mercedes ML 1999, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mercedes ML 1999. Due to the lower power, Mercedes ML 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 14.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 16.5 l/100km | 15.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes ML 2001 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML 1999, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML 2001 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML 2001 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML 1999. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 500 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mercedes ML 2001 and Mercedes ML 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |