Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes ML) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes ML engine produces 52 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 248 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 13.1 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 211 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes ML has 43 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`870 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |