Mercedes ML 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 55 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 16.0 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |