Mercedes ML 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes ML engine produces 47 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 13.1 | |
| Mercedes ML consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |