Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 68 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 63 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 11.7 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`365 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |