Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but Mercedes ML torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 204 mm (8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2020 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`870 kg | 2`506 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 1`980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 770 kg | 526 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |