Mercedes ML 2001 vs Nissan Pathfinder 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes ML engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.9 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
| |