Mercedes ML 2001 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes ML engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mercedes ML and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes ML has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |