Mercedes ML 2001 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML engine produces 38 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 117 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 6 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.3 metres less than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Lexus RX has
| |