Mercedes ML 2001 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 27 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 83 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller. Mercedes ML is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |