Mercedes ML 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 75 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 14.9 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes CLS | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2050 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`830 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`092 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 730 kg | 658 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |