Mercedes ML 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML engine produces 28 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes ML has 427 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`830 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |