Mercedes ML 2005 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 16 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity. Mercedes ML has 36 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Mercedes ML can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`830 | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |