Mercedes ML 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 11 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes ML consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 690 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2010 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Mercedes ML has 92 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`950 kg | 2`949 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`175 kg | 2`393 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 775 kg | 556 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |