Mercedes ML 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes ML engine produces 42 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Due to the lower power, Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mercedes ML and Land Rover Range Rover Velar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 673 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 37 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |