Mercedes ML 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
| Mercedes ML engine produces 18 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Velar, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar. Despite the higher power, Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes ML could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mercedes ML and Land Rover Range Rover Velar are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 673 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 2`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 38 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
| |