Mercedes ML 2011 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 13 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes ML consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes ML consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 3`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |