Mercedes ML 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 347 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 20 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.6 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes ML consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes ML consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLS, Mercedes SLK | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine: The variable valve timing regulators, oil pump, water pump, and thermostat are known for their limited lifespan. Another common issue is the clogging of oil channels with wear particles.
After ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013 3.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 690 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2010 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Mercedes ML has 92 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`900 kg | 2`812 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`130 kg | 2`121 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 770 kg | 691 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |