Mercedes ML 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2013

Mercedes ML
2011 -
Volvo XC60
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.1 Diesel2.0 Diesel


Power: 204 HP163 HP
Torque: 500 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds10.9 seconds
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes ML engine produces 41 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.06.4
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km8.4 l/100km
By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes ML consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1160 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1290 km on highway1320 km on highway
820 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)


Length: 4.80 m4.64 m
Width: 1.93 m1.89 m
Height: 1.80 m1.71 m
Mercedes ML is larger.
Mercedes ML is 16 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1455 litres
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`505
Safety: no datano data

Mercedes ML has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes ML, so Mercedes ML quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 17 80016 200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Volvo XC60 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: