Mercedes ML 2011 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes ML engine produces 41 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Mercedes ML reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes ML consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mercedes ML over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes ML consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Mercedes ML 2011 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 16 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 690 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2010 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity. Mercedes ML has 195 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 555 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes ML has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes ML, so Mercedes ML quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |