Mercedes ML 1998 vs Honda CR-V 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes ML
1998 - 2001
Honda CR-V
2002 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.3 - 5.4 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 2.4 (petrol)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mercedes ML is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 150 - 347 HP150 - 162 HP
Torque: 220 - 510 NM190 - 220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 12.3 seconds10 - 12 seconds
In general, Mercedes ML are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda CR-V. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 14.49.1 - 10.1
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.60 m4.57 m
Width: 1.83 m1.78 m
Height: 1.78 m1.71 m
Mercedes ML is larger.
Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 633 litres527 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2020 litres952 litres
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes ML has 106 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 1068 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 1.5 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`722~ 1`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 20001800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes ML has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • roomier boot
Honda CR-V has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv