Mercedes ML 1998 vs Nissan Terrano 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.4 | 2.4 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 347 HP | 118 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 510 NM | 191 - 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 12.3 seconds | 14.3 - 17.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.4 | 9.9 - 12.3 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Terrano. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`008 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |