Mercedes ML 2001 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes ML is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 5.4 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 347 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 - 560 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.2 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes ML are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 14.8 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 189 - 204 mm (7.4 - 8 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2020 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes ML has 43 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`870 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |