Mercedes ML 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes ML
2005 - 2008
Volvo XC90
2006 - 2012
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Mercedes ML is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes ML is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.0 - 6.22.4 - 4.4

Performance

Power: 190 - 510 HP163 - 315 HP
Torque: 350 - 700 NM320 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5 - 9.8 seconds7.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 16.08.2 - 13.5
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.81 m
Width: 1.91 m1.91 m
Height: 1.82 m1.77 m
Mercedes ML is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 551 litres249 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1837 litres
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes ML has 302 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Mercedes ML can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`854~ 2`735
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 60009200
Rating in user reviews: 9.3/10 8.9/10
Pros and Cons: Mercedes ML has
  • automatic transmission only
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo XC90 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv