Mercedes ML 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes ML is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes ML is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.2 | 2.4 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 - 510 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 700 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.8 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 16.0 | 8.2 - 13.5 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Mercedes ML is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes ML has 302 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Mercedes ML can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`854 | ~ 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |