Mercedes ML 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.0 - 6.2 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 - 510 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
Torque: | 350 - 700 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 9.8 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 16.0 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
Mercedes ML is larger. Mercedes ML is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes ML is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 551 litres | 978 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes ML has 427 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mercedes ML uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mercedes ML can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`854 | ~ 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |