Mercedes ML 2011 vs Mercedes GL 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.1 - 4.7 | 3.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 408 HP | 250 - 558 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 620 NM | 480 - 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 9 seconds | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.3 | 8.0 - 12.3 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GL. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 5.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Mercedes ML is smaller. Mercedes ML is 32 cm shorter than the Mercedes GL, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes ML is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 690 litres | 680 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2300 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes ML has 10 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GL. The Mercedes GL may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes GL, which means Mercedes ML can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`917 | ~ 3`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
| |