Mercedes ML 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes ML is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.1 - 4.7 | 3.0 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 408 HP | 247 - 468 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 - 620 NM | 347 - 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 9 seconds | 5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.5 | 7.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Mercedes ML petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mercedes ML equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes ML is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes ML is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 690 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2010 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Mercedes ML has 92 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 456 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes ML is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`920 kg | ~ 2`948 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`164 kg | ~ 2`281 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 756 kg | ~ 667 kg | |
| Mercedes ML load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes ML has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |