Mercedes GLK 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLK engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes GLK consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes GLK could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes GLK consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes GLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mercedes GLK and Honda CR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 955 litres | |
| Mercedes GLK has 106 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLK (by 595 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes GLK has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLK has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |