Mercedes GLK 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Mercedes GLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLK engine produces 41 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Mercedes GLK is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes GLK consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Mercedes GLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes GLK consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Mercedes GLK 2012 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Mercedes GLK is smaller. Mercedes GLK is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLK is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1500 litres | 1455 litres | |
Mercedes GLK has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLK (by 45 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes GLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Volvo XC60 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes GLK, so Volvo XC60 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 15 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLK has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |