Mercedes GLK 2012 vs Mercedes C class 2013
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes GLK engine produces 61 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mercedes GLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes GLK consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes GLK could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes GLK consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes GLK 2012 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mercedes GLK is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLK is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Mercedes GLK has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.22 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLK is 0.38 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`420 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes GLK has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |