Mercedes GLC 2023 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024

 
Mercedes GLC
2023 -
Skoda Kodiaq
2024 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 170 HP265 HP
Torque: 250 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds6.4 seconds
Skoda Kodiaq is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes GLC engine produces 95 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. Due to the lower power, Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.38.6
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes GLC consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Mercedes GLC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 840 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.76 m
Width: 1.92 m1.86 m
Height: 1.60 m1.66 m
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower.
Mercedes GLC is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 545 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1490 litres2035 litres
Mercedes GLC has 205 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 545 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 metersno data
Gross weight: 2`435 kg2`500 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data39 200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes GLC has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Skoda Kodiaq has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv