Mercedes GLC 2023 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mercedes GLC) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Nissan X-Trail), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 476 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 545 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 346 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 225 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 7.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.5 l/100km + 12.7 kWh/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 17.80 € | 10.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower. Mercedes GLC is 10 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 390 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1335 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 160 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 542 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mercedes GLC can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`860 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`235 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 625 kg | 720 kg | |
| Mercedes GLC load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 62 000 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |