Mercedes GLC 2019 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mercedes GLC) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Nissan X-Trail), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 34 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.9 l/100km + 18.0 kWh/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.00 € | 11.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower. Mercedes GLC is 4 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 350 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1250 litres | 1877 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space (by 200 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 627 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mercedes GLC can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`610 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`965 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 670 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mercedes GLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 380 percent more cases than Mercedes GLC, so Mercedes GLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |