Mercedes GLC 2019 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.3 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Mercedes GLC) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Mitsubishi Outlander), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 61 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.9 l/100km + 18.0 kWh/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.00 € | 11.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower. Mercedes GLC is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 128 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1250 litres | 1608 litres | |
| Mercedes GLC has 222 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 358 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mercedes GLC can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`610 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 33 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |