Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Volvo XC60 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 211 HP | 203 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 8 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Ground clearance: | 123 mm (4.8 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
Mercedes GLC is 3 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes GLC is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1455 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 2`500 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mercedes GLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 860 percent more cases than Mercedes GLC, so Mercedes GLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |