Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Mercedes GLK 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes GLC and Mercedes GLK have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 66 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes GLK 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLK 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but slightly lower. Mercedes GLC is 13 cm longer than the Mercedes GLK, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`605 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mercedes GLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes GLK has serious deffects in 525 percent more cases than Mercedes GLC, so Mercedes GLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
| |