Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 24 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar F-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes GLC consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes GLC could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes GLC consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar F-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is smaller. Mercedes GLC and Jaguar F-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 650 litres | |
| Mercedes GLC has 8 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 750 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Mercedes GLC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |